Dear bee-campaigners,
Mike McCarthy has done a wonderful job in covering this story at The Independent in London. This looks too good to be true - but since Sir Robert Watson says that the UK Govt is going to reconsider its existing approval of neonicotinoids in the light of the new research from Stirling and from France - it looks as if the dam is finally bursting.
Anyone who would like to email Mike McCarthy and thank him personally - on behalf of bees, wildlife and the environment -please feel free to do so.
His email is: McCarthy
Cheers
Graham White (below is an edited version,ed)
The chief scientist at the Department of the Environment, Sir Robert Watson, told The Independent that the British Government is to reconsider its refusal to ban neonicotinoid pesticides (the nerve-agent chemicals blamed for the collapse of bee colonies worldwide).
Sir Robert, a former head of the UN climate panel, begins a comprehensive re-evaluation of the Government's stance after two new scientific studies (from Britain and France) strongly linked neonicotinoid use to bee declines. He said the new studies, and others, would be closely analysed.
Despite mounting evidence that they are harmful to bees and other pollinating insects, even in minute doses, the British Government has refused previous requests to consider a precautionary suspension of the chemicals, which have already been banned in France and Italy.
The role of bees in pollinating crops is worth billions of pounds annually to global agriculture. They are vital (as in ‘we need them to live, without them we’d be dead’ ed).
Even on Thursday, after the new studies were published, a spokesman for Defra (Department for Food and Rural Affairs) said the new research did not change the Government's position, and that "the evidence shows that neonicotinoids do not pose an unacceptable risk to honey bees". ( What planet is this spokesperson from? Not ours surely.ed)
But yesterday Sir Robert said:
"The real Defra position is the following: we will absolutely look at the University of Stirling work, the French work, and the American work that came out a couple of months ago [a study by the US government's leading bee researcher, Dr Jeffrey Pettis, which showed that exposure to microscopic doses of neonicotinoids weakened bees' resistance to disease]. We must look at this in real detail to see whether or not the current British position is correct or is incorrect.
He added:
"I want to get a really careful analysis of all three papers, and I've asked for a briefing on some ongoing work that we've been doing ourselves.
I want this all reassessed, very, very carefully."
Mike McCarthy
Dear friends,
The final PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies: Syngenta, Bayer, Monsanto, Dow, Dupont, and BASF is now available and may be downloaded here. PAN International organised a historic session of the Permanent People’s Tribunal in Bangalore on December 3-6, 2012, attended by hundreds of peasant farmers, agricultural workers, and activists. Witnesses from all over the world gave testimony on the human rights violations perpetrated by the agrochemical transnational corporations (TNCs). Below is a brief summary of the Tribunal’s Findings and Recommendations. Tribunal Findings:
The six TNCs are responsible for gross, widespread and systematic violations of the right to health and life, economic, social and cultural rights, as well as of civil and political rights, and women and children’s rights.
The United States, Switzerland, and Germany (Home States), have demonstrably failed to comply with their internationally accepted responsibility to promote and protect human rights, especially of vulnerable populations. These three States, where the six corporations are registered and headquartered, have failed to adequately regulate, monitor and discipline these entities by national laws and policy; have unjustifiably promoted a double standard approach prohibiting the production of hazardous chemicals at home while allowing their own TNCs unrestrained license for these enterprises in other States, especially of the Global South.
Technology-importing (Host) states are responsible for not adequately protecting human rights and social movement activists from vexation and harassment; not adequately protecting independent scientists; not fully pursuing alternatives and less hazardous forms of agricultural production; and not honouring obligations from the ILO Conventions.
Some of the policies of the WHO, FAO and ILO are not fully responsive to the urgency of regulation and redress, as articulated by suffering peoples, and human rights and social movement activist groups and associations. A more proactive role is especially indicated in the field of hazardous agrochemicals and agribusiness TNCs. UNESCO ought to take expeditious and effective steps for the protection of academic and scientific freedom of researchers and specialists who raise justifiable alarm over the long term impact of pesticides.
Tribunal Recommendations:
The establishment of an appropriate international mechanism to investigate gross and flagrant violations of human rights by TNCs, host and home states: a body, before which individual or collective victims could bring their claims and demands for justice.
For national governments and states not to ratify any new trade or investment agreement proposed without regard for human rights norms. To avoid granting immunity to agrochemical companies from criminal liability under national law. To accept a less heavy burden of proof on the victims and to legislate for the precautionary principle. To prevent TNCs from directly or indirectly harassing and intimidating scientists, farmers and human rights and environmental defenders.
To amend the Rome Statute in order to extend its jurisdiction to legal persons and include the most serious crimes against the environment, in addition to those already provided for crimes against humanity and war crimes.
The EU institutions to subject their international economic policy and cooperation to the international rules for the protection of human rights and the environment and to extend environmental liability to the activities of corporations with registered offices in the EU. ___________________________________________
The Permanent People's Tribunal Session on Agrochemical TNCs is organised by Pesticide Action Network International, a global network of more than 600 organisations in over 90 countries which has been working to eliminate the use of pesticides and other hazardous technologies.
See the full coverage of the PPT Session here. Download the final PPT Verdict against the Big Six Agrochemical Companies here. Graham White