23 April 2010

Towards a Jewish State


Part Six. 
Divisions between different Jewish groups have always existed. The Ashkenazi (nazi???) Jews (from Northern Europe) dislike the Sephardic Jews (from the Orient and the Mediterranean) but they especially hate the Yemeni Jews (brought into Palestine to replace Arab workers) because they were Arab Jews (go figure).
The term “Ashkenazi” actually comes from the Hebrew word for ‘Germany’ reflecting the fact that many Ashkenazi Jews settled in Germany and along the Rhine Valley. Over time, the Ashkenazim were pushed back into Eastern Europe.
In Sydney we have the Jews who are sick of the ‘survivor Jews’; the Jews from Europe hate the ‘suburban’ South African Jews and they all hate the Russian Jews who arrived most recently. This is normal in the Jewish community. Argument is normal – the old Jewish joke goes ‘If you have two Jews you will have three sides of an argument.  My daughters reject their Jewish heritage because of Israel.
The majority of Zionist officials who held power from the 1920’s through to the 1970’s came from Eastern Europe and are thought to be descendant from the Khazar people who converted to Judaism. The Khazars originated in the Caucasus, not in Palestine and therefore had no part in Hebrew history and are not Semites.
The Khazars were a potent military force in Eastern Europe till about the middle of the 11th century, their last power base being the Crimean peninsula. In the 7th and 8th centuries, they defeated the Eastern Caliphate in several key battles, thus halting the spread of  Islam north of the Caucasus mountain range, much the same as what the Carolingian rulers did to the Western Caliphate at the Pyrenees. (Ironically, these Jewish converts made Eastern Europe safe for Christianity.) The Khazars gained control over major waterways such as the Caspian Sea, the Volga River, and the Dnieper River. The Khazar kings collected tribute from many of the East Slavic tribes as well as from traders traversing their country. Large garrisons were stationed at hill-forts located at strategic points throughout the kingdom (e.g., Kiev by the Dnieper, Sarkel by the Don, Samandar by the Caspian) to guard against enemy invaders.  
The king of the Khazars learned the Torah with the assistance of the Jewish preacher Isaac Sangari, whose existence has recently been verified (by the discovery of poems authored by Sangari in the Firkovitch collection of manuscripts). In the 9th century, the Khazarian kings and nobles officially converted to Judaism. Surrounded by the Islamic Eastern Caliphate of Persia and the Christian Byzantine Empire, the Khazars may have chosen Judaism as their state religion to avoid being religiously (and hence politically) dominated by either empire, so that they could avoid being labelled as heathens while at the same time remaining independent of their powerful neighbours. By the start of the 10th century, Judaism gained a stronghold among the common Khazar people, and the Hebrew script came into use in Khazaria. However, most of the soldiers in the Khazar army were Muslims, and the non-Khazar ethnic groups within the Khazar Empire (such as the Slavs, Bulgars, and Goths) did not adopt Judaism but rather remained pagans, Muslims, and Christians.
Shlomo Sands in[i] his book The Invention of the Jewish Nation has a chapter titled ‘Realms of Silence’. He quotes the well-known Jewish author Arthur Koestler, a Zionist pioneer in his youth.  Koestler [ii] ;
writing about the Khazar wrote… ‘genetically they are more closely related to the Hun, Uiger and Madyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’ Shlomo comments ‘Koestler was not certain, in the 1970’s whether the non- Ashkenazi Jews were descendants of the Judeans, and if the Khazar conversion was an exception in Jewish history. At the end of his book Koestler covers himself by saying “[iii]
Israel’s right to exist is not based on the hypothetical origins of the Jewish people, nor the mythological covenant of Abraham with God; it is based on international law - i.e. on the United Nations’ decision in 1947 ….  Whatever the Israeli citizens’ racial origins, and whatever illusions they entertain about them, their State exists de jure and de facto, and cannot be undone, except by genocide.
Shlomo continues;
… In the 1970’s Israel was caught up in the momentum of territorial expansion, and without the Old Testament in its hand and the ‘exile of the Jewish’ in its memory, it would have no justification for annexing Arab Jerusalem and establishing settlements in the West bank, the Gaza Strip, the Golan heights and even the Sinai Peninsula. …. the Zionist was entirely caught up in the mythology of an eternal ‘ethnic’ time.[iv]
From the end of WWI the Zionist leadership concentrated on mobilising its community towards one clear goal - the construction of an infrastructure for a Jewish State in Palestine. Eastern European Jews who had arrived in the second aliya produced the first strata of leaders and formed the core from which the political elite was drawn until the 1970’s. This system of quasi alternative Government was in full operation by the 1930’s.[v]
Ilan Pappe, who in 2004 taught both Israeli and Palestinian students in Haifa, writes
‘The Zionist leaders had a holistic approach to their role, which permeated every sphere of their communal life with force and determination, just as it (Zionism) invaded every neglected or empty space in the land it could reach.’[vi] 
The Zionists greatest success was in extracting the Zionist community from the British colonial state in significant spheres of life.  One of the earliest examples of this was education.
The Zionist educational unit founded in 1914 was an essential tool in creating a new reality. [vii]  The most surprising act by the British colonial government was to appoint several Zionists to the general directory of education, which was responsible only for the Palestinian, i.e. government, schools.[viii]
Unfortunately the Palestinians leaders, it seems, were ready to leave the social and economic life of Palestine to the British.  
The Palestinian leaders, semi-feudal in the countryside and authoritarian in the cities, were unable to transcend the narrow world of the politics of notables. In a situation where political elites fought each other vehemently, this narrowmindedness was tantamount to paralysis and stagnation.[ix]
Palestinians were dispossessed in many ways including the Zionists fully exploiting the (mostly Ottoman) ownership laws to take over lands that had been cultivated by the same families for centuries without ownership. Another common method was to purchase land from absentee landlords and then evict the tenants.
Jacqueline Rose quotes Hannah Arendt as having predicted with uncanny prescience the future of the new nation after its victory in the coming (1948) war.
‘The ‘victorious’ Jews would live surrounded by an entirely hostile Arab population, secluded inside ever-threatened borders, absorbed with physical self-defence to a degree that would submerge all other interests and activities. The growth of a Jewish culture would cease to be the concern of the whole people; social experiments would have to be discarded as impractical luxuries; political thought would centre around military strategy; economic development would be determined exclusively by the need of war.’ [x]
In November 1947 a proposal was put forward in the United Nations proposing a partition of Palestine. It would create two states. Maps, including the failed 1937 partition from the Peel commission, available at
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/israel_hist_1973.jpg  show the suggested partition - but maybe more interestingly are the ‘pre biblical’ maps, which seem to give a detailed geographical location for the periods 930 BC to 142 BC. I guess they were drawn up and placed into the dead sea scrolls or something – there is no reference to where they come from. That they exist as a record in an institution such as the Texas library demonstrates the depth of reach that the Zionists and their supporters have had.
The world’s two biggest powers; both holders of veto power; the British and US Governments were Israel’s major backers with their support for the 1947 partition. Although these Governments had a long record of supporting the Zionists’ work over many decades it appears that the German Holocaust against the European Jews, and others, was the clincher behind the UN decision to give Palestine to the Jews – not that Palestine or Germany were related in any way.  Palestinians immediately opposed this decision made by foreigners over their lives.  They attacked Jewish settlements and so began the ‘official war ‘that lasted from May 1948 to January 1949.  The Zionists’ planning since 1946 for this battle gave them the edge over Palestinians who lacked the logistic and planning skills experience and faced a better-equipped Jewish army.
Palestinian military strategy was undermined by a secret agreement between the Jordanians and the Zionists that the Jordanians would fudge their army’s support so that it would be ineffective. The armies of Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon proved to be grossly ineffective against the well trained Jewish soldiers. 
The ethnic cleansing began in March 1948,[xi] two months before the State of Israel was declared. Extreme violence was used including the murder of whole Arab village populations (eg Dir Yassin April 1948).  In some villages only males between 13 and 50 years old  were slaughtered. These murders were mostly accompanied by the total destruction of the villages.  In preparing for the possibility of not winning total victory the Zionists had studied the geographical importance of each village and lists of villages designated for obliteration were handed out to army commanders. About half of the 1000 Palestinian villages, established for centuries, were so destroyed.
70,000 of the large landholders in Palestine and the Palestinian ‘notables’, had left the country by January 1948[xii], having botched their responsibility for the political negotiations.
The British Government, which abandoned its legal and moral responsibility for the Mandate, fled home by the middle of May 1948 after the ceasefire. Pro- Zionist British officers gave one of the Zionist gangs, the Hagana, control of essential services and military bases while pro-Palestinian British officers were unable to contact the Palestinians. Bank accounts in Britain holding money accumulated over 30 years from Palestine were handed over by the British to the Jews.[xiii]
In 1947 Jews possessed only 6% of the land, had a population that was just 30% of the total Palestinian population - with the vast majority of that 30% having been in Palestine for less than five years. 
In 1948, 750,000 Palestinian people were dispossessed of their land, farms, houses and businesses and forced into exile by the Zionists. This of course radically changed the numbers as this 750,000 represented ‘90% of those living in what had been designated to be the Jewish State’[xiv]. This vile, desperate situation of the Palestinian exiles festers to this day.
The three books written by Jewish authors (Ilan Pappe’s A history of Modern Palestine, 2004, Jacqueline Roses’ The Question is Zion, 2005 and the recent book by Shlomo Sand The Invention of the Jewish People, 2009) are essential reading for a fuller understanding of this subject but it is to a book written by a Palestinian that I will now turn to, to close this brief, clumsy attempt to share some of the story of the theft of Palestine from its people in the process of the creating a Jewish State - The Question of Palestine by Edward W. Said[xv]
Page 69 (condensed extract)
            …. although it coincided with an era of the most virulent Western anti-Semitism,
Zionism also coincided with the period of unparalleled European territorial acquisition in Africa and Asia, and it was as part of this general movement of acquisition and occupation that Zionism was launched initially by Theodor Herzl………
Zionism never spoke of itself as a Jewish liberation movement, but rather as a Jewish movement for colonial settlement in the Orient. To those Palestinian victims that Zionism sought to displace, the fact that the Zionists had been victims of European anti-Semitism, cannot have helped their understanding of  Israel’s continued oppression of Palestinians. Palestinians could see quite clearly that, once victims themselves, Occidental Jews in Israel had become oppressors …. (the fact that) no sizable segment of the Israeli population has as yet been able to confront the terrible social and political injustice done to the native, is an indication of how deeply ingrained are the (by now) anomalous imperialist perspectives basic to Zionism. The fact that no Palestinian has as yet been able to reconcile himself to Zionism suggests the extent to which, for the Palestinian, Zionism has appeared to be an uncompromisingly exclusionary, discriminatory, colonialist praxis (accepted practise).
Page 72  One needs to repeat that what in Zionism served the no doubt justified ends of Jewish tradition, saving the Jews as a people from homelessness and anti-Semitism and restoring them to nationhood, also collaborated with those aspects of the dominant Western Culture (in which Zionism institutionally lived) making it possible for Europeans to view non-Europeans as inferior, marginal, and irrelevant.
(Something to think about when Israel celebrates the sixty-second anniversary of its‘creation day’ this May eh)
Stephen O’Rourke
Bibliography:
Bethmann, Erich W., Decisive Years in Palestine, 1918-1948, American Friends of the Middle East, New York1957
Davies, Norman, A History of Europe, Pimlico, London, 1997
Elston, D.R., No Alternative-Israel Observed, Hutchinson, London, 1960
Kimmerling, Baruch, Zionism and Territory, University of California, Berkeley, 1983
Mendes-Flohr, Paul & Reinharz, Jehuda (compilers and Editors), The Jew in the Modern World – A Documentary History. (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, New York, 1995
Pappe, Ilan, A History of Modern Palestine, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004
Parkinson, C.Northcote, East and West, John Murray, London, 1963
Rabinowicz, Oskar, K., Fifty Years of Zionism, Robert Anscombe & Co, London, 1950
Said, Edward W., The Question of Palestine, Vintage Books, New York, 1980
Said, Edward W., Orientalism-Western concepts of the Orient, Penguin Books, London.1978
Sands, Shlomo, The Invention of the Jewish People, (Translated Yael Lotan) Verso, London, 2008
Segev, T., One Palestine, Complete – Jews and Arabs under the Mandate, (translated from Hebrew by Hain Watzman), Metropolitan Books, London, 1999
Shafir, Gershon, Land, Labor and The Origins of The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 1882-1914, University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1996
Shapira, Anita, Land and Power- The Zionist Resort to Force, 1881-1948, Stanford University Press, Stanford C.A., 1992
Edward W. Said, The Question of Palestine, Vintage, New York, 1979
Simons, Chaim, International Proposals to Transfer Arabs from Palestine 1895-1947,
Ktav, Hoboken, New Jersey, 1988
Spiro, Rabbi Ken, http://www.aish.com/jl/h/48960501.hhtml
Stein, Kenneth W., Quotes from-The Land Question in Palestine, 1917-1939, University of North Caroline, 1984, http://pnews.org/art/4art/Landquestion.shtml pages 1-10
Stein, Leonard, The Balfour Declaration, Vallentine-Mitchell, London, 1961
Sternhell, Zeev, The Founding Myths of Israel, translated by David Maisel, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1998 (Electronic book version)


[i] Sands, Shlomo, The Invention of the Jewish People, (Translated Yael Lotan) Verso, London, 2008, pp 239
[ii] Arthur Koestler, The Thirteenth tribe, Hutchinson, London, 1976, pp17
[iii] ibid, pp 223
[iv] Shlomo Sands, Ibid, pp239
[v] Pappe, Ilan, A History of Modern Palestine, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004, pp 89
[vi] Ibid  pp88
[vii] Ibid.
[viii] Ibid  pp89
[ix] Ibid, pp87
[x] Jacqueline Rose, ‘The Question is Zion’, (quoting Hannah Arendt, from her article” To save the Jewish Homeland- there is still time”,  May 1948 in The Jew as Pariah p187.)Princeton University Press, London, 2005,pp
[xi] Pappe, Ilan, A History of Modern Palestine, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004, pp137
[xii] Ibid, pp 130
[xiii] Ibid, pp 135
[xiv] Ibid, pp 139
[xv] Edward W. Said, The Question of Palestine, Vintage, New York, 1979

Cover















Roger Morton
For days our television screen was filled with images of the Icelandic volcano, Eyjafjallajokull and the ash-filled, thick cloud skies.

16 April 2010

Afghanistan






































Photos: Mr Mwezi
Captions: 1) Gateway to Kandahar at an intersection of Kabul, Pakistan Highways;
2) Kandahar Arch 3) Afghan goats 4) street scene

Interesting how the 3 main political British leaders avoided mentioning Afghanistan in their first televised political debate. I think the budget for the war in Afghanistan is £4.5bln each year. Quite a tidy sum. If they pulled the soldiers out, they could reallocate that money to health, education, housing, transport, pensions. All those areas need money – they are not looking after their citizens properly. They lack education, they can’t afford proper health care. Many die needlessly from neglect or lack of correct treatment. These citizens also lack a sense of well-being, of hope, of community spirit. They are violent and unemployed. They weren’t born like that.
How can a British government justify spending those billions in Afghanistan when their own citizens are so poorly off?
It was sad to note that the Green Party were not asked to participate in the debate. I think their leader, Caroline Lucas would have done justice to her party. I read their manifesto today. It made good sense. It was straightforward and it looked as though they did know how to balance their sums. They are not just intellectuals, there are many practical and environmentally sound members in their midst. I just don’t know why they are not seizing the moment when the other parties are in such obvious disarray.
Joselyn Morton

Roger Morton

Roger Morton

Environmental


Global warming sceptics might be having a less sympathetic audience at the moment as thousands of travellers are stranded at airports in Europe. Obviously the volcanic eruption in Iceland cannot be linked to global warming but it is possible that it might set those stranded travellers thinking about how weather conditions and climate can effect one’s life.
A recent Greenpeace investigation revealed that a Kanzas-based company called Koch industries has been instrumental in hampering or tampering with climate change opinion. It has, in fact been donating large sums of money to conservative groups for them to spread misinformation and attack the work of climate scientists. Koch Industies owns refineries and it operates oil pipelines. Between 1997 and 2008 it has donated nearly 32m (3 times as much as ExxonMobil donated … these right-wing groups who oppose the notion of climate change are raking in the dough!) Koch also spent $37m on direct lobbying to support fossil fuels.
Greenpeace has accused these groups of spreading inaccurate and misleading information about climate scientists and clean energy companies. These groups (Americans for Prosperity, the Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute, the Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment) have all been accused of ‘spinning’ the University of East Anglia emails scandal.
Koch Industries is a $100bn a year conglomerate dominated by petroleum and chemical interests with operations in 60 countries and 70,000 employees. Its refineries process 8000,000 barrels of crude oil per day in the US. Most of its assets are owned by Charles and David Koch.
In 2000 the Environmental Protection Agency fined Koch Industries $30m for its oil 300 spills.
Joselyn Morton

Chiang Dao, Thailand

All images: Chris Mougne
Captions: 1) one of the gems of wisdom on the 500 step path to the mountain-top temple near to the Nest.
2) at this pont the temple looked impossible to reach in the heat of noon, but we struggled on …3)it was worth the struggle – this is taken from the top of the stupa looking down at where the previous shot was taken 4) inside he stupa 5) stupa ceiling 6) wall detail 7) Apsara 8) Looking towards Burma









Poem



















Rafael Nadal today beat Juan Carlos in Monte Carlo

Anyone for Tennis ?

I read that the bones
in a tennis player’s serving arm
are three times the weight of the other one.
I’m trying to balance the sum in my head because
maybe this explains why women get fat but the equation
doesn’t add up, I have to go back to the drawing board and start again.
I have a blank spot where maths are concerned, Something I just never learned.
by Joselyn Duffy Morton ©

 

BBC Radio 7














Hello again,
If a week is a long time in politics, then two weeks can also be a long time in broadcasting.
On returning to Radio 7 from a two-week break, I certainly expected a few snippets of news, mostly to do with rights clearances and permissions (one of the titles cleared in my absence was for the dramatisation of Mary Poppins, which, I'm pleased to say, you can look forward to hearing on the Bank Holiday Monday, 31st May)
News I wasn't expecting to hear, however, was the announcement that the Controller of Radio 4 and Radio 7, Mark Damazer, is leaving the BBC and "going back to university" to become Head of St Peter's College, Oxford.
With a distinguished career in broadcasting already to his credit, Mark was appointed Controller of Radio 4 and Radio 7 six years ago. He is an inspirational manager, and was instrumental in building the Radio 4 audience to over 10 million, with the station receiving the accolade from the Sony Radio Academy as "UK Station of the Year" in 2008.
Mark also champions and guides us on Radio 7 of course, unstintingly supportive of new ideas and developments for our young network. Amongst the many plaudits appearing in the press, I rather liked this one: ‘Mark Damazer has been an ambitious and self-effacing channel controller - the sort...who gives the BBC a good name’.
You might be interested to read Mark's blog from this week, and his thoughts on leaving Radio 4: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radio4/2010/04/leaving_radio_4.html
We shall all miss him terribly when he moves on, as he says. "from one great public to another.”
Mary Kalemkerian, Head of Programmes, BBC, Radio 7

Towards a Jewish State




















Western Wall, Jerusalem. Roger Morton
Part Five
Life in the ‘promised land’ would it be living the dream, or facing reality? 
While the World Zionist Organisation pursued plans to remove the indigenous population of Palestine the first tentative steps in establishing a Zionist presence in Palestine began in 1882.
Gershon Shafir in his book ‘Land, Labor and the origins of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.1882- 1914’ writes
‘Without the cooperation of Palestinian Arab villagers the earliest Jewish settlers would have been in dire straits. Early immigrants in Hadera, Mishmar Hayarden, Metulla, Machnanayim etc. received part of their agricultural training from their Palestinian neighbors or laborers and frequently they also learned how to perform semi-agricultural and non agricultural tasks from experienced Palestinians. In Galilee they used the traditional Arab nail-plough, drawn by oxen; in many places they took to raising crops that were successfully grown in adjacent Palestinian villages.’[i]
Jewish settlers relied in many ways on Palestinians in the first decade or so but the idealistic settlers realised that in order to provide income enough to fund a European life style they needed to acquire more land. As in all European colonies land ownership would be the issue that became the source of conflict between the settlers and the indigenous population.
 The World Zionist Organisation’ in 1901 founded the ‘Jewish National Fund’ which began buying land in Ottoman Palestine.  When the JNF began buying land the backwardness nature of the Ottoman land registration and a long history of ‘traditional’ understandings led to many confrontations between the Palestinians and the European settlers. Gershon Shafir believes that much of the conflict was ‘rooted in dispossession, real or intended.
The Palestinians in the early days were unaware of the ultimate goal of Zionism and had no reason to be hostile to the immigrants from Europe and initially maybe even benefited a little from the influx of capital. In addition to the conflicts over land two other factors contributed to rising Palestinian discontent. First was the establishment of the ‘Young Turks’ in Istanbul –  which can be seen as the birth of nationalism in the region, and second the increase of Jewish immigration to Palestine, which stepped up in 1925 after the USA changed its immigration regulations. The Palestinians began to resist the increase in the number of European migrants.
One the most powerful effects of the conflict that evolved between the pioneering Zionists from Europe and the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine was that it fed the sense of nationalism in both sides.
All colonised people have discovered that when they rise up against European colonisers they find to that the invaders have endless supplies of people and resources.  When Palestinian resistance of 1925 became violent the violence against Jews increased support for the Zionists from World Jewry.  In addition to the financial benefits, the Zionists knew how to present the situation to a largely uninformed western Press, particularly the English and American Press. Britain held the power of a Mandate over Palestine, and the Untied States of America was the rising new leader of the western world with a Jewish population of over two million.
British Complicity.
 In October 1915 British had promised to the Sharif of Mecca,[ii] that all Arab territory, including Palestine, under the Ottoman Empire would become part of an independent Arab kingdom. This was a trade off for Arab military support against the Ottomans in WW1. (Later, in 1922, the Arabs were further insulted when they were told by one individual General that the British had not really intended to include Palestine in the 1915 agreement.[iii])
Less than a year later, in May 1916, in the secret ‘Sykes-Picot’[iv] agreement, the British also arranged with the French that, post WW1, Palestine would become an International Enclave under joint French and British control. This enclave would form part of an oil rich Middle East that Britain and France planned to divide between them at the end of WWl.
As well as these two agreements with the Sharif of Mecca and the French, the British made a third. 
In 1917 whilst struggling for funds to fight the war, the British were strongly lobbied by the British Zionists. In response to the lobbying the British Government sent a letter (which had been prepared for the British by the Zionists) to the Jewish financier and Zionist supporter, Lord Rothschild. The letter (now referred to as the Balfour Declaration) contained the statement that the British Government backed the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. It also included the acknowledgement to ‘the civic and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.’[v]  The huge Arab ‘majority’ in Palestine is not acknowledged in the letter, nor was the Palestinian people’s political rights. [1] 
The Zionists (a small minority of world Jews at the time) had in securing the Balfour declaration garnered their first strong support from a Great Power. The likelihood of an Allied victory in WWI would soon give Britain political and legal control over Palestine and so make it well placed to support the establishment of a Jewish homeland. This was great political victory for the Zionists, especially for Chaim Weizmann who would become the first President of Israel, but it was a major blow to the Palestinians who in 1917 were only just beginning to come to terms with their situation.
All this grandiose Imperialistic planning by the British had not however included them having to fight another World War - a war that would cost them their Empire.
Post- WWII, Britain would no longer be able to afford to maintain the mandate over Palestine.  Zionist terrorists in Palestine began to attack the army of this failing world power at a time when calls were being made for Britain to shed the empire it could no longer afford.
Zionists had begun to use the term Arab when discussing the Palestinians. This led to the argument that as ‘all’ the non Jewish Palestinians were ‘arabs’ surely they could go and live in one of the many Arab countries throughout the Middle East and North Africa.
Also by removing the term ‘Palestinia’ when referring to the indigenous population, obliviously the Zionists lessened the Palestinians indigenous connection with Palestine. Arabs could now be portrayed as opportunist migrants (from the 7th century) whilst Jews were portrayed as an ‘ancient race’, a ‘people’, and a ‘nation’ seeking to return to their ’rightful’ place of abode from where they had been exiled by the Romans. (read Shlomo Sand’s book The Invention of the Jewish People).
The Zionists and now the Israeli Government seem not to consider that Jews were just one part of the indigenous population of Judea and Samaria prior to the Babylonian invasion of 586BCE and since the mass exodus of 70AD, a very small part of the indigenous population of Palestine. Nations did not exist in 586BCE or even 70AD.
‘How can Jews, who demand emancipation in Russia, rob rights and act selfishly toward other workers upon coming to Eretz Israel? If it is possible for many a people to hide fairness and justice behind cannon smoke, how and behind what shall we hide fairness and justice? We should absolutely not deceive ourselves with terrible visions. We shall never possess cannons, even if the goyim shall bear arms against one another for ever. Therefore, we cannot but settle in our land fairly and justly, to live and let live. ‘ (Meir Dizengoff (writing as ‘Dromi’) The Workers Question, Hatzvi, September 21, 22, 1909)
When the wastelands are prepared for colonization, when modern technique is introduced, and when the other obstacles are removed, there will be sufficient land to accommodate both the Jews and the Arabs. Normal relations between the Jews and Arabs will and must prevail (Ber Borochov - Eretz Yisrael in our program and tactics - 1917)
Palestine must be built up without violating the legitimate interests of the Arabs. Palestine is not Rhodesia ... 600,0000 Arabs live there, who before the sense of justice of the world have exactly the same rights to their homes as we have to our National Home. [vi][
Next week the final part of this story. ‘Victory and Defeat’ - the beginning of a seemingly endless struggle for this small piece of land between the Colonisers and the Dispossessed.
Stephen O’Rourke
Bibliography:
Bethmann, Erich W., Decisive Years in Palestine, 1918-1948, American Friends of the Middle East, New York1957
Davies, Norman, A History of Europe, Pimlico, London, 1997
Elston, D.R., No Alternative-Israel Observed, Hutchinson, London, 1960
Kimmerling, Baruch, Zionism and Territory, University of California, Berkeley, 1983
Mendes-Flohr, Paul & Reinharz, Jehuda (compilers and Editors), The Jew in the Modern World – A Documentary History. (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, New York, 1995
Pappe, Ilan, A History of Modern Palestine, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004
Parkinson, C.Northcote, East and West, John Murray, London, 1963
Rabinowicz, Oskar, K., Fifty Years of Zionism, Robert Anscombe& Co, London, 1950
Said, Edward W., The Question of Palestine, Vintage Books, New York, 1980
Said, Edward W., Orientalism-Western concepts of the Orient, Penguin Books, London.1978
Sands, Shlomo, The Invention of the Jewish People, (Translated Yael Lotan) Verso, London, 2008
Segev, T., One Palestine, Complete – Jews and Arabs under the Mandate, (translated from Hebrew by Hain Watzman), Metropolitan Books, London, 1999
Shafir, Gershon, Land, Labor and The Origins of The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 1882-1914, University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1996
Shapira, Anita, Land and Power- The Zionist Resort to Force, 1881-1948, Stanford University Press, Stanford C.A., 1992
Simons, Chaim, International Proposals to Transfer Arabs from Palestine 1895-1947,
Ktav, Hoboken, New Jersey, 1988
Spiro, Rabbi Ken, http://www.aish.com/jl/h/48960501.hhtml
Stein, Kenneth W., Quotes from-The Land Question in Palestine, 1917-1939, University of North Caroline, 1984, http://pnews.org/art/4art/Landquestion.shtml pages 1-10
Stein, Leonard, The Balfour Declaration, Vallentine-Mitchell, London, 1961
Sternhell, Zeev, The Founding Myths of Israel, translated by David Maisel, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1998 (Electronic book version)


[i] Shafir, Gershon, Land, Labor and The Origins of The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 1882-1914, University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1996, pp 199
[ii] Rabinowicz, Oskar, K., Fifty Years of Zionism, Robert Anscombe& Co, London, 1950 pp76
[iii] Bethmann, Erich W., Decisive Years in Palestine, 1918-1948, American Friends of the Middle East, New York1957 pp 6
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
[iv] Ibid
[v] Balfour Declaration from the copy included in the front section -Stein, Leonard, The Balfour Declaration, Vallentine-Mitchell, London, 1961
[vi] Chaim Weizmann, addressing the Fourteenth Zionist Congress in Vienna, 1925, quoted in Tessler, Mark, A History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1994 p. 181]

Cover



















Image of Kandahar street sign taken by Mr Mwezi during his stay in Afghanistan.

9 April 2010

Afghanistan

Captions: Suitcase containing ‘H’. The false epoxy base is exposed. It contains 2 bags of 1k ‘H’. Other images show a ball of 80g of hashish and 100g of hashish. Mr Mwezi






Poem


Heroes         

Middle-class but no wine
in the wine rack.
Sitting pretty but no
cash in the kitty.
Society fucked by
multi-nationals greed.
Heroes we can’t satisfy
till the bottom’s reached
till the well runs dry
till community is pie in the sky
and a glint in your eye
is a cry from a broken heart
of worried despair
for the air that we breathe
for the life we don’t want to leave.
by Joselyn Duffy Morton ©



Music


Scene Ouverte
Easter Saturday was the first Saturday in April, which meant it was also scene ouverte at La Gavotte and it was also the 2nd birthday of scene ouverte. Alain, the patron gave a little speech to mark the occasion and the serveuse took a gateau with candles up to the stage for the band to blow out. We all clapped and cheered and sang Joyeuse Anniversaire.
It’s good because we’re a disparate bunch and it just goes to show that it is possible for something to come out of nothing…. (though I have no great faith that this will be the case when Britain holds its elections on May 6.) Once again, the place was hopping and by the time we left, it was packed and everyone was on their feet dancing. Even better is that it is a grand mixture of French and English. Nice.
There were various mixtures on stage. Dottie sang Frankie and Johnny, Bill Bailley, and St James Infirmary with Dave Temple. She’s got a great presence and was very warmly received ; Keith sang with a friend he hadn’t seen for 25 years; Anvar’s back-up were much more relaxed and she was great. Six of the 7 Sons belted out some great numbers. I love their line-up. Who to watch? They’re all borderline sublime. They rock. They sang  We’re the ones, we’re the 7 sons …. the place erupts. It’s cool.
Quaintly, a curious tradition seems to have evolved, whereby the youngest performer has to wait to the very end to get their 15 seconds of glory on the stage. Saturday night was no exception – I believe the young singer guitar player (Enzo?) was 13 years old. He was totally at ease behind the mic, totally confident in front of the audience. He sang in English with a delightfully strong  French accent and everybody gave him a great reception. It didn’t apply to him – he was perfectly audible but my advice to any first-timers is make sure the mic is working properly. It is despair-making to watch someone giving their all on-stage and you can barely hear them.
Lastly, 7 Sons are playing again at Hotel Chene Vert, Riberac on Saturday May 15. I’ve got it noted in the agenda.
Joselyn Morton




Richard French's iPod









Return of the Rovers.
After a week of getting on and off-line to see whether BA were going to get off and on ground to fly us back to London, all went swimmingly well. After the sheer brutality of the cab ride from SoHo to JFK we were revived with free pre-flight massages and nursed across the Atlantic by a strike-busting husband and wife cabin crew. Nice touch this. Rather like having a live-in in-flight 'couple'.
London was (is) its normal grey self but what a contrast is the ride from LHR to soon-to-be leafy  Muswell Hill. Bonaparte's  'Nation of Shopkeepers' is so markedly different from our recently traversed  USA where nearly all retail business (New York apart) seems to have moved to out-of-town malls and shopping plazas with massive parking facilities, leaving traditional town centres to struggle on with  a mish-mash of tourist- attracting eateries, bars, cafes and hip stores. Indeed all good fun - but just nowhere to nip out for a bag of nails or the odd light bulb. It’s not Crouch End where a walk to the shops can supply all household and family needs, week in week out. A better way perhaps, with added on-foot exercise as a side benefit.
Hampstead Heath has always been, for me, the 8th Wonder of the World (and Central Park more surely the 9th) so, on a brisk Sunday morning we set out for a jet-lag-busting inter-family meeting at Kenwood. Strange how, after thirty-five years of living in North London it took a visiting weekend to discover the treasures that lie within this free-entry mansion bequeathed to the National Trust by Edward Guinness, the first Lord Iveagh in 1925. Behind the Adam facade is the most magnificent library and grand  works by Turner and  Constable, the most beautiful little Vermeer and a stunning Rembrandt self-portrait. The house overlooks a swath of heathland transformed by Humphrey Repton and although overgrown in recent years, it is slowly being returned to his original conception of lakeside views and wild flowered woodland. And it all for free, unlike the Spaniards Inn across the road where a modest but  welcome round of drinks and a few bags of crisps tipped the scales at some thirty quid plus. And, in contrast to free entry to Kenwood House, on the very nearby Bishop's Avenue the grossly vulgar London palaces of the international rich and infamous are being crudely turned into gated communities where their locked and barred mansions are guarded from view and intrusion by sad and bored uniformed figures huddled up with the tabloids and a mug of sweet PG Tips. I know which side of the road I prefer.
And then it was the miracle of computer-booked tickets via the Net and high-speed warm and comfy seats all the way to Angouleme -  via a change at Lille. To think when we bought Malardier in 1973 no Auto Route North or South existed, not even a Peripherique around Paris. But then the little auberges off the Route Nationale and schlepping through Paris with lunch in Les Halles were not without their pleasures ....
Richard French 
'Home is where the Cat is'  Richard French. Traveller and Dilletante.